Selection
Strict project selection
We don’t chase trends. Each project goes through our internal Project
Evidence Review—a process that weeds out anything with questionable
data. Only those with verifiable records and robust practices get
considered for our portfolio.
Verification
Independent verification
You want proof? We bring in third-party auditors and require field data,
not just projections. We call this the Transparency First Protocol. If
the results can’t be independently verified, we don’t touch it.
Compliance
Rigorous compliance
Every project is run through our Compliance Control Checklist.
Contracts, regulatory fit, and risk factors are scrutinized by our legal
and finance team—no shortcuts allowed.
Monitoring
Continuous monitoring
We use satellite imagery and regular on-site checks to monitor progress
and spot issues early. The Ongoing Evidence Loop keeps us honest and
clients informed from start to finish.
Step-by-step project review
Methodologies are only as good as their weakest link. That’s why we built a chain of checks, so each stage can be independently reviewed.
Source from trusted networks
We start by sourcing projects through local networks and independent researchers. Only those meeting our tough initial criteria enter the review pipeline.
Full-spectrum due diligence
Our due diligence team collects and verifies every data point—site visits, soil analyses, and historical records are mandatory before any project is considered.
Third-party verification required
We require all projects to undergo independent third-party audits. No audit, no deal. This is how we separate talk from truth.
Rigorous compliance and risk review
Legal, financial, and regulatory reviews come next. We reject anything that doesn’t meet the bar for compliance and risk disclosure.
Ongoing project monitoring
We implement ongoing monitoring using satellite imaging and scheduled site visits. Real-time reporting is shared with all stakeholders, not just internal teams.
Transparent results and open feedback
Every project gets a transparent feedback loop. We document both successes and setbacks, updating all partners and investors openly at regular intervals.
Our process in detail
No two projects are alike, so we never rely on a formula. Instead, we enforce a step-by-step review process that puts evidence before enthusiasm.
01
Project screening and selection
It starts with a deep-dive into each project’s data—soil tests, previous land use,
and projected outcomes. The Project Evidence Review method ensures only projects
with real, verifiable data get shortlisted.
02
External audit and validation
Every shortlisted project faces third-party audits. We invite independent experts to
validate claims, inspect records, and review all evidence before moving forward.
03
Legal and compliance check
Legal and regulatory compliance is non-negotiable. Our Compliance Control Checklist
reviews contracts, risk disclosures, and local legal fit before any investment is
considered.
04
Active project monitoring and reporting
We don’t disappear after a project is funded. Regular field checks, satellite monitoring, and open reporting form the backbone of our Ongoing Evidence Loop, keeping every stakeholder informed and every claim verifiable.
How we stack up
Most people treat alternative investing like a black box. We built a process where every
claim is reviewed and every project must stand up to outside scrutiny.
Binjiendouwadi
Carbon farming projects provide open reporting, independent audits, and verifiable impact with every investment.
Custom
Traditional options
Traditional alternatives offer predictable statements but little visibility into actual project impact or environmental outcomes.
Varies
Carbon farming projects
2
vs
1
Traditional alternatives
0
vs
0
Why the difference matters
2
Binjiendouwadi Total Features
1
Traditional options Total Features